Home
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
< LEED/Green
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
< 30 Year Customer
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
< LEED/Green
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
< 30 Year Customer
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Cambridge vs. Infrared (Radiant)
Heating System
Warehouse #1 |
 |
Warehouse #2 |
||
 |
 |
|||
150,000 ft2 x 27' high, R-15 Roof/R-12 Walls |
100,000 ft2 x 28' high, R-15 Roof/R-12 Walls |
|||
|
Infrared (Radiant) Heating System |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Cost |
 |
$ .75/therm |
$9,000 |
$1.00/therm |
$11,000 |
$1.25/therm |
$14,000 |
Results:
The Cambridge Heating System used 41%less gas per sq. ft. of floor space and provided ventilation.
If Warehouse #2 had installed a high efficiency Cambridge System they could have saved