Home
Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
< LEED/Green
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
< 30 Year Customer
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)


Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Recreational Facility
< Restaurant
< Retrofit
< LEED/Green
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
< 30 Year Customer
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)

Cambridge vs. Draw-Thru Make Up Air
(80% Recirculation - 20% Outdoor Air)
Large Warehouse #1 |
Large Warehouse #2 |
|||
1.7 million ft2 x 40' high, R-13 Roof/R-10 Walls |
1.4 million ft2 x 45' high, R-19 Roof /R-19 Walls |
|||
|
Make-Up Air Heating System |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Cost |
Electric Cost |
![]() |
$ .75/therm |
$ .08/kwh |
$252,000 |
$1.00/therm |
$ .10/kwh |
$336,000 |
$1.25/therm |
$.12/kwh |
$392,000 |
Results:
Cambridge Heating System used 68%less total energy on a cost per ft2 basis.
If Large Warehouse #2 had installed a high efficiency Cambridge System they could have saved

