Case Studies
Overview
Customer Solutions
< Warehouse/
Distribution
< Manufacturing Plant
< Retrofit
< Sports Facility
< Auto Service
< Carwash
< Restaurant
< LEED/Green
Testimonials
< Energy Savings
< Lowest Total Costs
< 30 Year Customer
Building Study
Program
< U.S. Facility
< Canadian Facility
< Comparative Studies
< Retrofits
Comparison Studies
< Boilers
< Unit Heaters
< Air Turnover
< Infrared (Radiant)
< Direct-Fired
(100% MUA)
< Direct-Fired
(80/20 MUA)
Comparison Building Studies…
Cambridge vs. Other Heating Systems
Every manufacturer of gas-fired unit heaters, boilers, infrared heaters, air rotation systems and direct gas-fired air heating equipment says they have an energy efficient design that costs less to operate. They talk about heat exchanger efficiencies, burner efficiencies, heating people not air, re-heating air, not re-heating air, stratified air, blow-thru heaters, max temperature ratings and the list goes on. All of this information is true, but what does it mean in terms of cost per sq. ft. to heat a large commercial or industrial building? What type of space heating system really is the most energy efficient for your facility? Who has the "Proof" to back up their claims? The answer is Cambridge Engineering.
We have the Proof
Our unique Building Study Program includes onsite building studies from the past 10 years. In each study, we measured, tracked and documented heating/ventilating system performance under actual cold weather conditions for an extended period of time. This program includes onsite studies for both Cambridge Blow-Thru Space Heaters and other industrial space heating systems.
Check out the annual energy savings with Cambridge heaters as presented in the following Comparison Building Studies:
| Other Industrial Heating Systems |
Energy Savings with Blow-Thru® Space Heaters |
Comparison Building Studies (click on links below) |
| Indirect Gas-Fired Systems | ||
| Boilers | 40% to 70% |
Cambridge vs. Boiler |
| Unit Heaters | 30% to 50% |
Cambridge vs. Unit Heater |
| Air Turnover Systems | 25% to 70% |
Cambridge vs. Air Turnover |
| Infrared (Radiant) | 15% to 40% |
Cambridge vs. Infrared |
| Direct Gas-Fired Systems | ||
| Make-Up Air (MUA) | 20% to 50% |
Cambridge vs. Make-Up Air |
| Recirculation (pressurization) | 20% to 50% |
Cambridge vs. Recirculation |
*Note: Some Buildings show more energy savings than listed above.